메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제16권 제2호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
91 - 107 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose – The purpose of this study was to examine the relevance between managerial centrality and managerial overconfidence. The higher the managerial centrality, the higher is expected to be the managerial overconfidence. Design/methodology/approach– This study wants to verify the relevance between managerial centrality and managerial overconfidence through multiple regression analysis. To this end, the management centrality is measured by the manager compensation difference (CEO Pay Slice; CPS) presented in the Bebchuk, Martijn and Peyer (2011), and the managerial overconfidence is measured by the methodology presented in the research in Ahmed and Dullman (2013) and Schrand and Zechman(2012), respectively. The study sample is 1,250 companies-year in the non-financial company, which closed in December on listing the Korea Exchange from 2013 to 2017. Findings– Empirical analysis results, CEO Pay Slice (CPS) and managerial overconfidence was found to have a positive (+) relevance at a statistically significant level. So the larger the managerial centrality, the higher the managerial overconfidence. Therefore, it has been shown that there are differences in managerial overconfidence depending on the managerial centrality. Research implications or Originality– It is expected that this study will contribute to the research in that it is the first study to verify that the managerial centrality affects the managerial overconfidence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0