개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper reviews the current situation and the suggestions of Artificial Intelligence & Law research from the perspective of legal argumentation. Since the 1950's, especially in Europa and USA, the interest in Artificial Intelligence began to grow among scholars in computer science. And since the 1970’s, especially in Europa, the studies in legal argumentation began to grow rapidly among the scholars not in argumentation theory, but also in legal theory and legal philosophy. In spite of this wide tendency in a world in which we live today, the concept 'AI & Law and legal reasoning' in field of legal reasoning of Korea is for the most part unknown, insofar as I can understand. Douglas Walton recently have attempt to integrate with logic, rhetoric and computational dialectic, so to speak, AI in a deliberative democratic society.
All these endeavor have a confirmed basic viewpoint. It is that the logical validity of an inference not purely depends on the meaning of some structural words involved in the inference, but sentences that are distinguishable from a logical point of view can very well play different roles in an argument.
In this paper are introduced nonmonotic logic, defeasible reasoning, case-based reasoning, HYPO, CATO, CABARET, argument scheme and so on, to help legal scholar in Korea make sense of legal reasoning in AI & Law research.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0